Head-to-head Updated

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 6 road tests and 3,266 + 16,816 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance is ahead, 73–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental EcoContact 6

EcoContact 6

Summer

± 5

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 43 · 3,266 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
± 7

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 72 · 16,816 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I must admit to raising the preasures when on a long run and / or loaded up for European jaunt 2.2 bar front 2.4 bar rear Im going to pump em up a bit now and see what it drives like empty”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance +14
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests7780
    Reviews found online4574

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.3 = 64

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 74.1 = 78

  2. 51

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance +28
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests5379
    Reviews found online4778

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.4 + 40% × 47.4 = 51

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79 + 40% × 78.4 = 79

  3. 56

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)61
    Reviews found online4974

    EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.4 = 56

    EfficientGrip Performance: 40% × 60.7 + 60% × 74.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 78

    Noise

    EcoContact 6 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests8571
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 78

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 60

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7964
    Reviews found online3264

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 32 = 60

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 64 + 40% × 63.5 = 64

  6. 45

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip Performance +27
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Reviews found online4572
  7. 100

    Efficiency

    EcoContact 6 +21
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 4 tests10079
Scores at a glance
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental EcoContact 6Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Relative Score 59 73
Dry 64 78
Wet 51 79
Comfort 56 69
Noise 78 69
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) 45 72
Efficiency 100 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EcoContact 6

± 7

EfficientGrip Performance

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcoContact 6EfficientGrip PerformanceΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #3/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 97% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 99% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 89% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 99% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 83% #7/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 98% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 99% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 98% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 81% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 70% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 97% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 63% #6/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test 74% #4/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/21 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test #9/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 75% #16/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 56% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 2026 Auto Motor Und Sport Summer Tire Test R17 #8/8 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EcoContact 6

Pros

  • Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
  • Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
  • Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
All owner themes in the EcoContact 6 review

Tire B EfficientGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
  • Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
  • Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental EcoContact 6

Negative

Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.

r/AutoTuga ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-20

“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2026-03-20

“use up factory tires or replace them? asking for come clarity of mind. my (electric) car's factory tires are "not great", just ecocontact 6's that put efficiency over everything else basically, they are not directional and will probably last a long while because they are so hard. this winter i bought a set of pirelli winter 3's for my trip to norway but also for winter in general. those tires preform better on litteral ice than the ecocontact's do in the rain. its a striking difference. the pirellis handled a 13% incline of ice brilliantly and even actual blizzard conditions. (both i got on video as people didnt believe me) i am genuinely amazed what modern winter tires can do. but i am a bit torn on the choice between getting rid of basically brand new tires (they only did about 5k) and replacing them with something decent for the summer and having tires that actually work when its wet or stop when i need them to or keep driving them until the ones i got are worn out. to be clear, i dont give a crap about the effiicency or really the lifespan of tires. braking and wet performance is vastly more important to me than saving a Watt. saving energy nor lifespan isnt a great comfort when i'm sliding into another car or tree. would getting something decent make such a big difference to warrant the cost and waste or am i better off to just run these down first? edit: sidenote, the car in question is a Renault 5. its got a pretty weird tire size (195/55R18) that limits options a bit”

r/BMW ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-18

“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”

Top themes
#poor wet grip#energy efficiency#premature wear#tread chunking#factory OE fitment#replacement alternatives

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by manson The tyre noise between the three runs on the Goodyear EGP series was averaged at 74.1 dB. ... A little later, the GLA was ready to go on the Continental tyres and between the 3 runs (same as for the EGP series), the sound keeper recorded an average noise level of 76.3 dB . This implied a ~3% lower noise level on the EGP tyres: Although it is ~3% dB over dB, considering that 3dB corresponds to 2x loudness, the reduction may be more significant than what the number suggests.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-16

“GOODYEAR EfficientGrip Performance 205/55 R17 91V - reliability and resistance to damage question Hello guys! I'm driving Skoda Octavia. not a racer, just a usual 40yo man. I have a set of GOODYEAR EfficientGrip Performance 205/55 R17 91V on the car, and during the last 2 months I lost three tires, all the same way - pothole on the road, visibly small, front right wheel, instantly deflates, and a hole in tire not on tread but on the side - irreparable, new tire for 130eur, repeat again. Do you by chance know if it's the pattern for the model, or am I getting EXTREMELY unlucky? Can you maybe suggest some tire models and characteristics to look into to stop this from happening? I have only 2 out of 4 original tires left, so maybe it makes sense to change the entire set. Read more”

subaruforester.org ·2015-04-20

“I've just had these fitted too and have to say they seem much quieter than my Kumhos and certainly dry grip is excellent ( though I don't tend to drift round corners, unless something has gone wrong!)”

Top themes
#low road noise#wet braking performance#dry grip and handling#sidewall durability concerns#comfort and efficiency#tread pattern variations

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental EcoContact 6 B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10452
Rim diameters13″ – 22″14″ – 20″
Tread depth7/32″9/32″
UTQG320 A A340 A A
SidewallBlackwallRaised Black Lettering - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common4646

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental EcoContact 6

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 79 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 72 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental EcoContact 6 scores 100 vs 79 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 78 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Which is better in the wet, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 79 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 78 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Continental EcoContact 6, 78 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EcoContact 6 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Continental EcoContact 6, 100 vs 79 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology