tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 62 + 16,798 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: SP Sport FM800 and EfficientGrip Performance are level at 73.

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport FM800 Check price on Amazon · EfficientGrip Performance
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Tire BGoodyear

EfficientGrip Performance

Summer

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 71 · 16,798 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I've just had these fitted too and have to say they seem much quieter than my Kumhos and certainly dry grip is excellent ( though I don't tend to drift round corners, unless something has gone wrong!)”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 71 (est.)80
    Reviews found online7673

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 72.5 = 77

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 75 (est.)79
    Reviews found online7876

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 76

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 76.1 = 78

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    SP Sport FM800 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)61
    Reviews found online7473

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 72

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 61 + 40% × 73.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–71
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FM800 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7264

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 63.5 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 76

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport FM800 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800EfficientGrip Performance
    Reviews found online7671
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FM800Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Relative Score 73 73
Dry 73 77
Wet 76 78
Comfort 72 66
Noise – 70
Treadwear 69 64
Handling (owners) 76 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport FM800

EfficientGrip Performance

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FM800

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
  • High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
  • Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
  • Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
All owner themes in the SP Sport FM800 review

Tire B EfficientGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
  • Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
  • Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-03-28

“goodyear efficientgrip performance notches Hello! I bought a new goodyear efficientgrip performance 215/55/18 tires for my car. And it was surprise to see so many notches on the summer tire (1st & 2nd photo). Although the internet image doesn’t have any (3rd photo). What could it be and is it normal? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-08-27

“FWIW the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 225/60 R16 102W XL tyres arrived and were installed today. The difference with previous tyres is like night and day. I have a 1200 km work trip later this week and I thought I'd take the Benz out. Interesting to see how they "break in" and how much if at all difference there is in mpg.”
team-bhp.com

“Wet Braking Demonstration FlexContact Tech in the EGP series tyres implies the use of a new polymer tread compound for better grip in wet road conditions: For demonstration, we again had a GLA shod with Goodyear EGP tyres. The car would do three runs on the main straight and brake to a halt on an artificially created wet patch. After each run and subsequent halt, the braking distance was recorded. The braking distances between the 3 runs on the Goodyear tyres were averaged to 24.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt: Thereafter, the EGP tyres were swapped for a set of Continentals to do 3 identical runs in order to draw a direct reference point: Care was taken to maintain the wet patch in identical conditions by making use of mobile mini-tankers parked along the track: Panoramic alignment gone bad! Soon enough, we had the GLA ready to take on the wet braking test with the Continental tyres. The car averaged a braking distance of 25.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt:”
Top themes
#low road noise#wet braking performance#dry grip and handling#sidewall durability concerns#comfort and efficiency#tread pattern variations

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—52
Rim diameters—14″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—340 A A
Sidewall—Raised Black Lettering - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Too close to call: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance are within 2 points overall. Dunlop SP Sport FM800 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is stronger on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 77 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FM800 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or EfficientGrip Performance?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology