Tests 84 · 1 test Owners 78 · 50 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 vs Falken Azenis RT-615K — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ExtremeContact Sport 02 is ahead, 77–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
85
Dry
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +2065Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Professional tests (TWG score) 85 – Reviews found online 84 63 -
83
Wet
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +2360Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Professional tests (TWG score) 83 – Reviews found online 84 56 -
67
Snow
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +2938Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Reviews found online 65 16 -
73
Comfort
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +1261Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Reviews found online 77 52 -
69
Noise
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +960Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Reviews found online 73 50 -
71
Treadwear
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +2942Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Reviews found online 74 26 -
80
Handling
ExtremeContact Sport 02 +1862Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport 02 Azenis RT-615K Reviews found online 80 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Falken Azenis RT-615K |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 55 |
| Dry | 85 | 65 |
| Wet | 83 | 60 |
| Snow | 67 | 38 |
| Comfort | 73 | 61 |
| Noise | 69 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 42 |
| Handling | 80 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ExtremeContact Sport 02
Azenis RT-615K
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact Sport 02
Pros
- Phenomenal wet and dry traction with high hydroplaning resistance
- Superior ride comfort and compliance over bumps and road imperfections
- Significantly lower road noise and quieter cabin compared to factory tires and rivals
Cons
- Softer sidewalls result in a slightly mushy or less sharp initial turn-in response
- Tread wear can be rapid, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive or staggered vehicle fitments
- Can get greasy or lose performance rapidly when heavily pushed in sustained track environments
Tire B Azenis RT-615K
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and handling around corners
- Telepathic and highly responsive steering feedback
- Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan under aggressive driving
- Dangerous winter and snow performance
- Increased road noise at highway speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | B · Falken Azenis RT-615K |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 78 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 - 700 A - AA A | 200 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
Falken Azenis RT-615K
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 67 vs 38 on snow.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 71 vs 42 on treadwear.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 83 vs 60 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 85 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.