Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DW leads, 64–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Primacy MXM4 +373Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 71 51 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 51.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
ExtremeContact DW +1657Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 73 57 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 73
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 57.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
Primacy MXM4 +657Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 38 47 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 51
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 57
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
ExtremeContact DW +1354Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 66 48 ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.4 + 60% × 47.5 = 54
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Primacy MXM4 +775Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 70 ≈ 66 (est.) ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
Primacy MXM4 +1362Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 38 59 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 49
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DW +949Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Reviews found online 58 49 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison55Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DW | Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 62 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 73 | 57 |
| Snow | 51 | 57 |
| Comfort | 67 | 54 |
| Noise | 68 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 49 |
| Efficiency | – | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DW
Primacy MXM4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DW | Primacy MXM4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | #4/3 2024 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Tire B Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DW | B · Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 420 - 500 AA - B A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DW
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Narrow edge: Continental ExtremeContact DW — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if treadwear, noise and snow matter most to you. Continental ExtremeContact DW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 73 vs 57 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 62 vs 49 on treadwear.
Continental ExtremeContact DW scores 58 vs 49 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 73 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 57 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DW, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DW or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 62 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology