Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 72 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 73
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) – Reviews found online 39 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 70 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
49
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 38 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.2 = 49
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Geolandar H/T G95A Reviews found online 58 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DW | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | – |
| Dry | 70 | – |
| Wet | 73 | – |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | – |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 49 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
ExtremeContact DW
–
/ 100
Geolandar H/T G95A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Tire B Geolandar H/T G95A
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DW | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Continental ExtremeContact DW
–
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
Only Continental ExtremeContact DW has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DW
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology