tirewheelguide

Hankook Optimo H725A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Hankook Optimo H725A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 72–54

Check price on Amazon · ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725A
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725A

All-Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +21
    53
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7845

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +24
    53
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7947

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 53

    No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +14
    53
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6442

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 53

    No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +13
    56
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6843

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7350

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 61

    No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +8
    58
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6152

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 60.5 = 66

    Optimo H725A: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +28
    46
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Optimo H725A
    Reviews found online7446
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06Hankook Optimo H725A
Relative Score 72 54
Dry 74 53
Wet 77 53
Snow 67 53
Comfort 69 56
Noise 70 61
Treadwear 66 58
Handling (owners) 74 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ExtremeContact DWS 06

Optimo H725A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong performance in light snow and cold weather

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
  • Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 review

Tire B Optimo H725A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 B · Hankook Optimo H725A
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″10.5/32″
UTQG560 A - AA A340 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

Hankook Optimo H725A

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Optimo H725A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 77 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 53 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 77 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 74 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 70 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Optimo H725A?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology