Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 8 reviews
Continental ExtremeWinterContact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 8 + 49 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 860 is ahead, 79–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 49 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
WinterContact TS 860 +1077Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 66 81 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
WinterContact TS 860: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 81.1 = 77
No road tests of dry for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
WinterContact TS 860 +1588Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 89 Reviews found online 74 87 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
WinterContact TS 860: 60% × 89 + 40% × 86.9 = 88
No road tests of wet for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
73
Snow
WinterContact TS 860 +376Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 75 72 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73
WinterContact TS 860: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 72.1 = 76
No road tests of snow for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
WinterContact TS 860 +1378Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 64 79 ExtremeWinterContact: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
WinterContact TS 860: 40% × 76.9 + 60% × 78.7 = 78
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Noise
WinterContact TS 860 +1073Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 58 ≈ 67 (est.) ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 63
WinterContact TS 860: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 860. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
64
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 860 +1074Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 63 76 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
WinterContact TS 860: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 76.3 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 860 +1482Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Reviews found online 68 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison76Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact WinterContact TS 860 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeWinterContact | Continental WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 79 |
| Dry | 67 | 77 |
| Wet | 73 | 88 |
| Snow | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 65 | 78 |
| Noise | 63 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeWinterContact
WinterContact TS 860
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeWinterContact
Pros
- Outstanding traction and grip in deep snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Performs exceptionally well in extreme cold temperatures
- Surprisingly good dry-pavement handling comparable to high-quality all-season tires
Cons
- XL (extra load) variants may exhibit increased road noise
- Slightly poorer cornering and braking performance noted on heavier load applications for XL versions
Tire B WinterContact TS 860
Pros
- Exceptional grip and safety in wet and slushy conditions
- Outstanding performance on snow, providing high levels of confidence
- Remarkably low noise levels and high ride comfort
Cons
- Performance degradation noted by some users after 3-4 seasons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a slight loss of steering precision or 'wobble' in tight corners
- Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing stones/sand
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeWinterContact | B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 47 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeWinterContact
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ExtremeWinterContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 88 vs 73 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 82 vs 68 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 77 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 88 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 77 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 73 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 78 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeWinterContact or WinterContact TS 860?
Continental WinterContact TS 860, 74 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology