Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 8 reviews
Continental ExtremeWinterContact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
UltraGrip Performance is ahead, 76–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
UltraGrip Performance +875Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 66 79 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 75
No road tests of dry for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
UltraGrip Performance +780Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 74 83 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
No road tests of wet for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Snow
UltraGrip Performance +376Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 75 79 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73
UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 76
No road tests of snow for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
UltraGrip Performance +873Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 ExtremeWinterContact: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.3 = 65
UltraGrip Performance: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 58 – ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 63
No road tests of noise for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
UltraGrip Performance +670Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 73 ExtremeWinterContact: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeWinterContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
UltraGrip Performance +1280Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact UltraGrip Performance Reviews found online 68 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeWinterContact | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 76 |
| Dry | 67 | 75 |
| Wet | 73 | 80 |
| Snow | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 65 | 73 |
| Noise | 63 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeWinterContact
UltraGrip Performance
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeWinterContact
Pros
- Outstanding traction and grip in deep snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Performs exceptionally well in extreme cold temperatures
- Surprisingly good dry-pavement handling comparable to high-quality all-season tires
Cons
- XL (extra load) variants may exhibit increased road noise
- Slightly poorer cornering and braking performance noted on heavier load applications for XL versions
Tire B UltraGrip Performance
Pros
- Exceptional snow and ice traction
- Strong performance in wet and dry conditions
- High tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Increased road noise in warmer conditions
- Slightly higher fuel consumption
- Limited performance on pure ice surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeWinterContact | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeWinterContact
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ExtremeWinterContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 80 vs 68 on handling.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 75 vs 67 on dry.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 80 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeWinterContact or UltraGrip Performance?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 70 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology