Continental IceContact 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental IceContact 2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 2 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

IceContact 2 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental IceContact 2

IceContact 2

Winter

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    IceContact 2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6668

    IceContact 2: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 65.8 = 69

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests70≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7274

    IceContact 2: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 71

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    IceContact 2 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7367

    IceContact 2: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 72.7 = 76

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    IceContact 2 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6258

    IceContact 2: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–59

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6572

    IceContact 2: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    IceContact 2 +10
    59
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online6959
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63–
Scores at a glance
Continental IceContact 2 vs General Grabber A/TX: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental IceContact 2General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 70 68
Dry 69 68
Wet 71 73
Snow 76 68
Comfort 64 61
Noise – 64
Treadwear 65 70
Handling (owners) 69 59
Efficiency 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

IceContact 2

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A IceContact 2

Pros

  • Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
  • Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
  • Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions

Cons

  • Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
  • Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
  • Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
All owner themes in the IceContact 2 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental IceContact 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

ram-trx.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-03

“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”

f150forum.com

“Got tired of my stock tires looking undersized with my 2" level, so I finally put new ones on last week. I had KO2's on my last truck and was planning on going with them again, but I couldn't find the size I wanted at a decent price locally. I started reading reviews on TireRack and the General Grabber A/Tx gets the highest rating. I really liked the look and price, so I had my local Tire Discounters get me a set. These things are awesome. Very quiet and a smooth ride. I went with the LT285/60 20's (33.5") and they really fill out the wheel wells like they should.”

5thgenrams.com ·1 upvote ·2019-12-16

“I got the Grabber A/TXs put on Saturday night and on Sunday morning woke up to a fresh 3" of snow. That isn't enough for the roads to get plowed here so it quickly got compacted and icey. I had to go back and forth from home a couple of times on neighborhood roads that pretty much turned to ice by late afternoon. There was a few minles of highway driving as well. Not once did I lose control of the truck. Stayed in 2x4 the whole time. The traction control only turned on when I was gunning it around a corner to test the limits of the traction. Even then the truck never went out of line. I have the Grabber A/T2s on my Subaru (not snow rated in my size for some reason). Those tires have been great in the snow. These A/TXs are even better considering 2x4 and an unloaded bed. I highly recommend them to anyone looking for a great DD tire that doesn't need to be changed in the winter.”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental IceContact 2 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental IceContact 2

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: Continental IceContact 2 — better handling, snow and comfort. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental IceContact 2 scores 69 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental IceContact 2 scores 76 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental IceContact 2 scores 64 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental IceContact 2
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

Continental IceContact 2, 76 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

Continental IceContact 2, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, IceContact 2 or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology