Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 2 reviews
Continental IceContact 2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
IceContact 2 leads, 70–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
IceContact 2 +168Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) 71 – Reviews found online 66 69 -
71
Wet
Grabber A/TX +374Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 72 75 -
77
Snow
IceContact 2 +869Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 75 68 -
66
Comfort
Level66Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 63 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online – 62 -
65
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +469Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 65 72 -
71
Handling
IceContact 2 +1061Why this score
Source IceContact 2 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 71 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental IceContact 2 | General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 68 |
| Wet | 71 | 74 |
| Snow | 77 | 69 |
| Comfort | 66 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 69 |
| Handling | 71 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
IceContact 2
Grabber A/TX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A IceContact 2
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
- Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
- Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
- Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
- Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
Tire B Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental IceContact 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental IceContact 2 | B · General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 14 - 17/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental IceContact 2
General Grabber A/TX
Too close to call: Continental IceContact 2 and General Grabber A/TX are within 2 points overall. Continental IceContact 2 is stronger on handling and snow. General Grabber A/TX is stronger on treadwear and wet.
Continental IceContact 2 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.
Continental IceContact 2 scores 77 vs 69 on snow.
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.