Head-to-head Updated

Continental IceContact 2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

IceContact 2 leads, 70–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    IceContact 2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online6669
  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online7275
  3. 77

    Snow

    IceContact 2 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)78–
    Reviews found online7568
  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online6363
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online–62
  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online6572
  7. 71

    Handling

    IceContact 2 +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online7161
Scores at a glance
Continental IceContact 2 vs General Grabber A/TX: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental IceContact 2General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 70 69
Dry 69 68
Wet 71 74
Snow 77 69
Comfort 66 66
Noise – 65
Treadwear 65 69
Handling 71 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

IceContact 2

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A IceContact 2

Pros

  • Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
  • Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
  • Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions

Cons

  • Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
  • Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
  • Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
All owner themes in the IceContact 2 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental IceContact 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental IceContact 2 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental IceContact 2

General Grabber A/TX

Too close to call: Continental IceContact 2 and General Grabber A/TX are within 2 points overall. Continental IceContact 2 is stronger on handling and snow. General Grabber A/TX is stronger on treadwear and wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental IceContact 2 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental IceContact 2 scores 77 vs 69 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Continental IceContact 2
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

IceContact 2

Amazon