Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

EfficientGrip Performance is ahead, 72–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 202 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD (overall ranking)

“Quote: Originally Posted by Rudra Sen Hmm, so they can be a proper substitute if one doesn't get PP2 fresh stock? Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so.”

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 71 · 16,790 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 7 in 2019 Motor NAF/Vi Bilägare Summer Tire Test (Premium) (overall ranking)

“goodyear efficientgrip performance notches Hello! I bought a new goodyear efficientgrip performance 215/55/18 tires for my car. And it was surprise to see so many notches on the summer tire (1st & 2nd photo). Although the internet image doesn’t have any (3rd photo). What could it be and is it normal? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score)–79
    Reviews found online6573
  2. 68

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance +10
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score)–79
    Reviews found online6876
  3. 65

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score)–61
    Reviews found online6173
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
  5. 57

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Professional tests (TWG score)–64
    Reviews found online5164
  6. 63

    Handling

    EfficientGrip Performance +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2EfficientGrip Performance
    Reviews found online6371
Scores at a glance
Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 2Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Relative Score 64 72
Dry 66 76
Wet 68 78
Comfort 65 66
Noise – 70
Treadwear 57 64
Handling 63 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Premium Contact 2

EfficientGrip Performance

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryPremium Contact 2EfficientGrip PerformanceΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 33% #3/6 · 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD 17% #6/7 · 2019 Motor NAF/Vi Bilägare Summer Tire Test (Premium) +16.7 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 2

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • High level of steering feedback and communicative handling
  • Strong resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Performance degradation as the tire reaches the second half of its tread life
  • High price point relative to its longevity
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 2 review

Tire B EfficientGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
  • Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
  • Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Premium Contact 2

Mixed

Community feedback on the Continental Premium Contact 2 presents a mixed perspective, with some users highlighting poor treadwear and wet traction across Continental sets, while others appreciate its value pricing and OEM status. Discussions frequently focus on pricing versus competitors like Michelin PP2, sizing, asymmetric mounting requirements, and break-in behavior.

bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-02

“Re: directional Behaviour now greatly improved since tyres have bedded in, handling feels as it used to. Tried differing pressures but eventually ended up as per the book and previous tyre sets at 28 front 34 rears. Thanks for the warning about directional fitting, they are clearly marked and profiled for outside edge and fitted accordingly but I do not think they are directional. Just need rebalancing now they have settled.”

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by reignofchaos Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so. Given your style of driving, I wouldnt be surprised if the Advans last 10k! :”

bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-01

“These tires are directional, right? If so, make sure they're all installed in the right direction. A friend of mine recently had the exact problem you describe. After thinking it might be shocks, tire pressure, etc. we noticed that one of the tires was installed by the tire shop so it rotated in the wrong direction.”

Top themes
#treadwear and durability#pricing and value#tire break-in period#asymmetric mounting orientation#grip comparison with competitors#sidewall stiffness

Based on 11 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.

subaruforester.org ·2015-04-23

“I must admit to raising the preasures when on a long run and / or loaded up for European jaunt 2.2 bar front 2.4 bar rear Im going to pump em up a bit now and see what it drives like empty”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-08-27

“FWIW the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 225/60 R16 102W XL tyres arrived and were installed today. The difference with previous tyres is like night and day. I have a 1200 km work trip later this week and I thought I'd take the Benz out. Interesting to see how they "break in" and how much if at all difference there is in mpg.”

team-bhp.com

“Wet Braking Demonstration FlexContact Tech in the EGP series tyres implies the use of a new polymer tread compound for better grip in wet road conditions: For demonstration, we again had a GLA shod with Goodyear EGP tyres. The car would do three runs on the main straight and brake to a halt on an artificially created wet patch. After each run and subsequent halt, the braking distance was recorded. The braking distances between the 3 runs on the Goodyear tyres were averaged to 24.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt: Thereafter, the EGP tyres were swapped for a set of Continentals to do 3 identical runs in order to draw a direct reference point: Care was taken to maintain the wet patch in identical conditions by making use of mobile mini-tankers parked along the track: Panoramic alignment gone bad! Soon enough, we had the GLA ready to take on the wet braking test with the Continental tyres. The car averaged a braking distance of 25.5 meters from point of braking to an absolute halt:”

Top themes
#low road noise#wet braking performance#dry grip and handling#sidewall durability concerns#comfort and efficiency#tread pattern variations

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 2 B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3852
Rim diameters14″ – 18″14″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—340 A A
Sidewall—Raised Black Lettering - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 76 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 78 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 71 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 64 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 2
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Leads

EfficientGrip Performance

Amazon