Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 202 + 664 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 5 is ahead, 73–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental Premium Contact 2
± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 202 reviews

“Re: directional Behaviour now greatly improved since tyres have bedded in, handling feels as it used to. Tried differing pressures but eventually ended up as per the book and previous tyre sets at 28 front 34 rears. Thanks for the warning about directional fitting, they are clearly marked and profiled for outside edge and fitted accordingly but I do not think they are directional. Just need rebalancing now they have settled.”

Vredestein Quatrac 5

Quatrac 5

All Season

± 5

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 71 · 664 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

“A guy on YouTube vlogged his experience with the quatrac 5 in his mirage. It's a good all weather tire for the occasional blast of snow but is by no means a substitute for actual snow tires.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Quatrac 5 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6568

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 68.4 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Quatrac 5 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 69 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6774

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 74.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–70
    Reviews found online–69

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 69.4 = 70

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Quatrac 5 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5972

    Premium Contact 2: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.1 = 62

    Quatrac 5: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.6 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–73
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 5 +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 59 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4670

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.7 = 54

    Quatrac 5: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 70.1 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac 5 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Reviews found online6172
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Quatrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–66
Scores at a glance
Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 2Vredestein Quatrac 5
Relative Score 64 73
Dry 66 71
Wet 68 75
Snow – 70
Comfort 62 71
Noise – 70
Treadwear 54 72
Handling (owners) 61 72
Efficiency – 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Premium Contact 2

± 5

Quatrac 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPremium Contact 2Quatrac 5ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/9 2012 EVO Winter Tyre Test #14/15 2019 Autonavigator Summer Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 2

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • High level of steering feedback and communicative handling
  • Strong resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Performance degradation as the tire reaches the second half of its tread life
  • High price point relative to its longevity
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 2 review

Tire B Quatrac 5

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in wet conditions and winter weather (snow and ice)
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Good year-round versatility eliminating the need for seasonal tire swaps

Cons

  • Faster or uneven tread wear reported by some users, particularly on the outer edges
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a 'squishy' feel or slight loss of steering feedback
  • Less aggressive dry-pavement handling compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Premium Contact 2

Mixed

Community feedback on the Continental Premium Contact 2 presents a mixed perspective, with some users highlighting poor treadwear and wet traction across Continental sets, while others appreciate its value pricing and OEM status. Discussions frequently focus on pricing versus competitors like Michelin PP2, sizing, asymmetric mounting requirements, and break-in behavior.

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by reignofchaos Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so. Given your style of driving, I wouldnt be surprised if the Advans last 10k! :”

bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-01

“These tires are directional, right? If so, make sure they're all installed in the right direction. A friend of mine recently had the exact problem you describe. After thinking it might be shocks, tire pressure, etc. we noticed that one of the tires was installed by the tire shop so it rotated in the wrong direction.”

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Rudra Sen Hmm, so they can be a proper substitute if one doesn't get PP2 fresh stock? Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so.”

Top themes
#treadwear and durability#pricing and value#tire break-in period#asymmetric mounting orientation#grip comparison with competitors#sidewall stiffness

Based on 11 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac 5

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac 5 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong value, quiet comfort, and capable year-round traction. While recognized as a solid 3PMSF-rated all-weather tire, several users note that it cannot match dedicated winter tires in heavy snow and that tread wear can be rapid due to soft rubber compounds.

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Tread wear and longevity#Affordable price and value#Wet and dry handling#Road noise and comfort#All-weather 3PMSF performance

Based on 93 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 2 B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3863
Rim diameters14″ – 18″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common2121

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 2

Vredestein Quatrac 5

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 5 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 72 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 72 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 71 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 2
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5?

Which is better in the wet, Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Premium Contact 2 or Quatrac 5?

Vredestein Quatrac 5, 72 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology