Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 202 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Premium Contact 2 leads, 65–61 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental Premium Contact 2

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 202 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by Rudra Sen Hmm, so they can be a proper substitute if one doesn't get PP2 fresh stock? Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Premium Contact 2 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6555

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Premium Contact 2 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6855

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Premium Contact 2 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6154

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 65

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 57

    Treadwear

    Aspec A349 BluEarth +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5169

    Premium Contact 2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Premium Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Premium Contact 2 +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Aspec A349 BluEarth
    Reviews found online6361
Scores at a glance
Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 2Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Relative Score 65 61
Dry 66 59
Wet 68 59
Comfort 65 62
Treadwear 57 67
Handling (owners) 63 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Premium Contact 2

Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 2

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • High level of steering feedback and communicative handling
  • Strong resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Performance degradation as the tire reaches the second half of its tread life
  • High price point relative to its longevity
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 2 review

Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
All owner themes in the Aspec A349 BluEarth review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Premium Contact 2

Mixed

Community feedback on the Continental Premium Contact 2 presents a mixed perspective, with some users highlighting poor treadwear and wet traction across Continental sets, while others appreciate its value pricing and OEM status. Discussions frequently focus on pricing versus competitors like Michelin PP2, sizing, asymmetric mounting requirements, and break-in behavior.

bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-01

“These tires are directional, right? If so, make sure they're all installed in the right direction. A friend of mine recently had the exact problem you describe. After thinking it might be shocks, tire pressure, etc. we noticed that one of the tires was installed by the tire shop so it rotated in the wrong direction.”

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by reignofchaos Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so. Given your style of driving, I wouldnt be surprised if the Advans last 10k! :”

bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-02

“Re: directional Behaviour now greatly improved since tyres have bedded in, handling feels as it used to. Tried differing pressures but eventually ended up as per the book and previous tyre sets at 28 front 34 rears. Thanks for the warning about directional fitting, they are clearly marked and profiled for outside edge and fitted accordingly but I do not think they are directional. Just need rebalancing now they have settled.”

Top themes
#treadwear and durability#pricing and value#tire break-in period#asymmetric mounting orientation#grip comparison with competitors#sidewall stiffness

Based on 11 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 2 B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available38—
Rim diameters14″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 2

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Narrow edge: Continental Premium Contact 2 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 67 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Premium Contact 2 scores 68 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Premium Contact 2 scores 66 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental Premium Contact 2 scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 2
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Which is better in the wet, Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Continental Premium Contact 2, 68 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Continental Premium Contact 2, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Continental Premium Contact 2, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Premium Contact 2 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 67 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology