Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 42 + 31 road tests and 2,358 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 79–70
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 910 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 39 / 28 tests | 88 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 74 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 17 shared tests · wins 16–1 | 97% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 6–4 | 98% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 6–0 | 93% | 70% |
| Safety (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 90% | 60% |
| Steering Response (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 67% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 40 / 29 tests | 88 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 78 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–1 | 89% | 85% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 5–7 | 93% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 5–1 | 84% | 77% |
| Wet Lateral Stability (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 70% | 80% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 18 shared tests · wins 8–9 | 95% | 96% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 97% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 14 shared tests · wins 7–5 | 96% | 96% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 84
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 45 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 6 tests | 80 | 40 |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 67 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 87% | 75% |
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.3 + 60% × 66.9 = 56
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 18 tests | 43 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 67 |
| Noise (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–9 | 97% | 98% |
| Exterior Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 60% | 70% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 55
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.9 = 66
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 5 tests | 88 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 54 |
| Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–0 | 98% | 82% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 72 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 19 tests | 74 | 50 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 10–0 | 91% | 84% |
| Category | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 70 |
| Dry | 84 | 73 |
| Wet | 85 | 84 |
| Snow | 74 | 55 |
| Comfort | 75 | 56 |
| Noise | 55 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 74 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PremiumContact 6
Azenis FK510
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 24 tests that ran both, Continental PremiumContact 6 finished ahead 17 times and Falken Azenis FK510 7 times.
| Discipline | Category | PremiumContact 6 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 94% | +3.0 | 16–1 in 17 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 97% | +0.5 | 6–4 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 93% | 70% | +22.3 | 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Safety | Dry | 90% | 60% | +30.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Steering Response | Dry | 100% | 67% | +33.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 89% | 85% | +3.3 | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% | 93% | +0.5 | 5–7 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 96% | −0.9 | 8–9 in 18 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% | 97% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 96% | +0.5 | 7–5 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 84% | 77% | +6.4 | 5–1 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Wet Lateral Stability | Wet | 70% | 80% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 87% | 75% | +12.8 | 3–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Exterior Noise | Noise | 60% | 70% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 98% | −1.4 | 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 98% | 82% | +16.5 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 91% | 84% | +7.0 | 10–0 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 65% | 81% | −15.7 | 0–8 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #2/20 | #6/20 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 86% | 87% | −0.5 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/9 | #8/9 | – | 17–7 in 24 shared tests Newest: 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 · 245/45R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Based on 17 community posts
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Based on 63 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact 6 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 113 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A - AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 34 | 34 |
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better efficiency, snow and comfort. Pick the Falken Azenis FK510 if noise matters most to you.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 74 vs 50 on efficiency.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 74 vs 55 on snow.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 56 on comfort.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 66 on treadwear.
Falken Azenis FK510 won 9 of 9 shared noise tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 85 vs 84 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 73 on our dry score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 55 on our snow score.
Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 55 on our noise score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 50 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
