Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 42 + 0 road tests and 2,350 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–47
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,350 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 9 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 39 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 54 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 35 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 84
Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 54.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.7 = 46
No road tests of dry for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 40 / – tests | 89 | ≈ 53 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 38 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 89 + 40% × 80.6 = 86
Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 38.4 = 47
No road tests of wet for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 77 | – |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 82 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 44 |
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 81.8 + 60% × 71.5 = 76
Ventus ME01 K144: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.9 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests | 43 | – |
| Reviews found online | 73 | – |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43 + 40% × 72.7 = 55
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 41 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.3 + 40% × 64.9 = 79
Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 51
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 78 | 41 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Category | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 47 |
| Dry | 84 | 46 |
| Wet | 86 | 47 |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 52 |
| Noise | 55 | – |
| Treadwear | 79 | 51 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 41 |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
PremiumContact 6
Ventus ME01 K144
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
Based on 16 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact 6 | B · Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 113 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Continental PremiumContact 6
Hankook Ventus ME01 K144
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 86 vs 47 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 46 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 78 vs 41 on handling.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 51 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 86 vs 47 on our wet score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 46 on our dry score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 76 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 51 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
