tirewheelguide

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Crugen HP71 46, Ventus ME01 K144 47.

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HP71 Check price on Amazon · Ventus ME01 K144
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Ventus ME01 K144 +2
    46
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online3235

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.9 = 44

    Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 54.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.7 = 46

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    Crugen HP71 +5
    47
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online4538

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52

    Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 38.4 = 47

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online42–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    Ventus ME01 K144 +7
    52
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3344

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45

    Ventus ME01 K144: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.9 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online37–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 55

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Ventus ME01 K144 +14
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online1841

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.2 = 37

    Ventus ME01 K144: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 51

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ME01 K144. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP71 +11
    41
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Ventus ME01 K144
    Reviews found online5241
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Hankook Ventus ME01 K144
Relative Score 46 47
Dry 44 46
Wet 52 47
Snow 53 –
Comfort 45 52
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 37 51
Handling (owners) 52 41

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Ventus ME01 K144

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Ventus ME01 K144

Pros

  • High levels of cabin comfort
  • Extremely quiet operation

Cons

  • Poor traction on both wet and dry surfaces
  • Increased braking distances required
  • Weak sidewall construction prone to damage
All owner themes in the Ventus ME01 K144 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/CX5 ·1 upvote ·2026-10-04

“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”
r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/KiaEV6 ·2 upvotes ·2023-06-08

“Tire troubles - 19" Kumho Crugen HP71 I have a US spec 2022 Wind AWD with 23,000 miles on these Kumho tires. In my less than 9 months of ownership I've had two tires patched from slow leaks and I just had to have the foam lining removed from a tire since it separated from the inner tire wall and created massive vibrations in the steering wheel. With one of the patches my local shop pulled a stone that was less than 1/4" from the tread where it punctured the tire. Yes, it was pointy and sharp but also comically tiny. I'm I just extra special lucky or are others having issues with these tires? I really hope there are more options for our vehicles when it comes time to replace these.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Hankook Ventus ME01 K144
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available63—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9.9/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144

Too close to call: Kumho Crugen HP71 and Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Crugen HP71 is stronger on handling and wet. Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 scores 51 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 52 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144 scores 52 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 52 vs 47 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ME01 K144
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 52 vs 47 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144?

Neither, by our numbers: 44 vs 46 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144?

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144, 52 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Ventus ME01 K144?

Hankook Ventus ME01 K144, 51 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology