Head-to-head Updated

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 77–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 82 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,329 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 (dry braking)

“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”

Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,155 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aqua)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 82

    Dry

    PremiumContact 6 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)8678
    Reviews found online7671
    Dry Braking (% of best)100%92%
    Dry Handling (% of best)100%85%
    Dry (% of best)98%87%
  2. 83

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +1
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)8790
    Reviews found online7873
    Longitudinal Aquaplaning (% of best)70%100%
    Transverse Aquaplaning (% of best)90%90%
    Wet (% of best)96%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best)99%99%
    Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best)100%95%
    Wet Circle (% of best)97%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best)98%92%
  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Reviews found online76–
  4. 77

    Comfort

    PremiumContact 6 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)8275
    Reviews found online7165
  5. 52

    Noise

    PremiumContact 6 +17
    35
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)3915
    Reviews found online71–
    Exterior Noise (% of best)98%43%
  6. 76

    Treadwear

    PremiumContact 6 +24
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)8445
    Reviews found online6563
  7. 75

    Handling

    PremiumContact 6 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71
    Reviews found online7571
Scores at a glance
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PremiumContact 6Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 77 68
Dry 82 75
Wet 83 84
Snow 73 –
Comfort 77 71
Noise 52 35
Treadwear 76 52
Handling 75 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryPremiumContact 6Ecsta PS71ΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 77% #10/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test 86% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −8.7 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 92% #28/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout +7.8 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #3/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 85% #7/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +15.4 Different tests
Dry Dry 98% #3/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 87% #10/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +10.9 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 79% #13/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test 79% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −0.2 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 96% #6/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test 93% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +3.4 Different tests
Exterior Noise Noise 98% #5/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 43% #10/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +55.1 Different tests
Abrasion Other 50% #10/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 51% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −1.2 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #12/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 99% #7/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test −0.5 Same test
Price Other 49% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 83% #6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test −34.4 Different tests
Value Other 80% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 54% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +26.4 Same test
Wear Other 94% #3/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 50% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +43.4 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test 25% #4/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout −12.5 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 97% #6/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −2.9 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 100% #1/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 94% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +6.0 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 82% #8/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test 92% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −10.1 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 89% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 89% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 0.0 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #10/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test 0% #7/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Longitudinal Aquaplaning Wet 70% #4/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 100% #1/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −30.0 Different tests
Transverse Aquaplaning Wet 90% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 90% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 0.0 Different tests
Wet Wet 96% #5/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 94% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 +1.6 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #4/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test −0.1 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 95% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +5.0 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 97% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test −1.8 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #12/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test 92% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test +5.7 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PremiumContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
  • Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
  • High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence

Cons

  • Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
  • Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
All owner themes in the PremiumContact 6 review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental PremiumContact 6

Positive

Community opinion on the Continental PremiumContact 6 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, reliable braking performance, and balanced ride comfort compared to stiffer alternatives. While some note high replacement costs or faster wear on heavy electric vehicles, drivers generally praise the tire as a worthy investment for safety and all-around performance.

r/ex30 ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-14

“I switched out my 20” good year’s that came with the car for a set of continental premium contact 6 POL a month ago before a vacation trip. They were excellent in heavy rain. Can recommend. EX30 2024 TM Ultra.”

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2026-09-01

“Pirelli PZero PZ5 too stiff for my like, Continental PremiumContact 6 too soft... I had some cheap 225/45/18 tyres for my older 3.0L RWD car with a quite stiff sport suspension. Replaced them with 225/40/18 Pirelli PZero PZ5. I realized these had a 5 % smaller sidewall, but 225/40 is the basic size. These were way too stiff for me! Roads here have plenty of imperfections and the bumps were giving me a headache. I managed to sell the old PZ5 for a good price and replaced them with Continental PremiumContact 6s, now with larger sidewall 225/45/18. It's alright, but there's definitely less road feedback than PZ5s. So I'm not really that happy with either. What would have been the best compromise between PZ5 and PC6? Goodyear Assymetric 6? Or maybe my fault was going for 40 % sidewall, PZ5 with 45 may had been suitable? It's just that the 45s cost way much more as a more rare size. Read more”

r/nzev ·1 upvote ·2026-06-29

“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Ride comfort and softness#Treadwear and longevity#Price and value#Braking safety

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management

Based on 19 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PremiumContact 6 B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available113133
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG280 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PremiumContact 6

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better treadwear, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 76 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 52 vs 35 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 82 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental PremiumContact 6
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

77

Leads

PremiumContact 6

Amazon