Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 77–43
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,329 reviews
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
Tests – · none yet Owners 31 · 4 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 37 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 34 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 76 | 12 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 22 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 39 | – |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 31 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 34 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 75 | 32 |
| Category | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Yokohama AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 43 |
| Dry | 82 | 48 |
| Wet | 83 | 43 |
| Snow | 73 | 35 |
| Comfort | 77 | 46 |
| Noise | 52 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 47 |
| Handling | 75 | 32 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PremiumContact 6
AVID S34NV
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Continental PremiumContact 6 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, reliable braking performance, and balanced ride comfort compared to stiffer alternatives. While some note high replacement costs or faster wear on heavy electric vehicles, drivers generally praise the tire as a worthy investment for safety and all-around performance.
“I switched out my 20” good year’s that came with the car for a set of continental premium contact 6 POL a month ago before a vacation trip. They were excellent in heavy rain. Can recommend. EX30 2024 TM Ultra.”
“Pirelli PZero PZ5 too stiff for my like, Continental PremiumContact 6 too soft... I had some cheap 225/45/18 tyres for my older 3.0L RWD car with a quite stiff sport suspension. Replaced them with 225/40/18 Pirelli PZero PZ5. I realized these had a 5 % smaller sidewall, but 225/40 is the basic size. These were way too stiff for me! Roads here have plenty of imperfections and the bumps were giving me a headache. I managed to sell the old PZ5 for a good price and replaced them with Continental PremiumContact 6s, now with larger sidewall 225/45/18. It's alright, but there's definitely less road feedback than PZ5s. So I'm not really that happy with either. What would have been the best compromise between PZ5 and PC6? Goodyear Assymetric 6? Or maybe my fault was going for 40 % sidewall, PZ5 with 45 may had been suitable? It's just that the 45s cost way much more as a more rare size. Read more”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
Based on 10 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact 6 | B · Yokohama AVID S34NV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 113 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A - AA A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Continental PremiumContact 6
Yokohama AVID S34NV
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 32 on handling.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 83 vs 43 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 73 vs 35 on snow.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 82 vs 48 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.
