Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 42 + 0 road tests and 2,364 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 79–67
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,364 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 39 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 73 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78.1 = 84
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 40 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 70 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 80.5 = 85
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 50 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 58
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 69 |
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.1 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests | 43 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 72 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.3 = 55
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 68
No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 63 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 79
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 68 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Category | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 67 |
| Dry | 84 | 71 |
| Wet | 85 | 70 |
| Snow | 74 | 58 |
| Comfort | 75 | 69 |
| Noise | 55 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 68 |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
PremiumContact 6
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
“Pirelli PZero PZ5 too stiff for my like, Continental PremiumContact 6 too soft... I had some cheap 225/45/18 tyres for my older 3.0L RWD car with a quite stiff sport suspension. Replaced them with 225/40/18 Pirelli PZero PZ5. I realized these had a 5 % smaller sidewall, but 225/40 is the basic size. These were way too stiff for me! Roads here have plenty of imperfections and the bumps were giving me a headache. I managed to sell the old PZ5 for a good price and replaced them with Continental PremiumContact 6s, now with larger sidewall 225/45/18. It's alright, but there's definitely less road feedback than PZ5s. So I'm not really that happy with either. What would have been the best compromise between PZ5 and PC6? Goodyear Assymetric 6? Or maybe my fault was going for 40 % sidewall, PZ5 with 45 may had been suitable? It's just that the 45s cost way much more as a more rare size. Read more”
Based on 17 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact 6 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 113 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A - AA A | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Continental PremiumContact 6
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 if noise matters most to you.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 74 vs 58 on snow.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 85 vs 70 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 64 on treadwear.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 70 on our wet score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 71 on our dry score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 58 on our snow score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 68 vs 55 on our noise score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
