Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact GX SSR vs Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ProContact GX SSR and Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are level at 62.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6064

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for ProContact GX SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6464

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of wet for ProContact GX SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ProContact GX SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ProContact GX SSR +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5548

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for ProContact GX SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    ProContact GX SSR +5
    50
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online4739

    ProContact GX SSR: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 55

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact GX SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProContact GX SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Reviews found online5861
Scores at a glance
Continental ProContact GX SSR vs Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContact GX SSRContinental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 63 66
Wet 65 65
Snow 61 –
Comfort 62 58
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 55 50
Handling (owners) 58 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ProContact GX SSR

Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact GX SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
  • Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
  • Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
  • Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
  • Elevated road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact GX SSR B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available15—
Rim diameters18″ – 19″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty55,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact GX SSR

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Too close to call: Continental ProContact GX SSR and Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are within 2 points overall. Continental ProContact GX SSR is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on dry. Continental ProContact GX SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ProContact GX SSR scores 55 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ProContact GX SSR scores 62 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 66 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ProContact GX SSR
Tire B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat, 66 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental ProContact GX SSR, 62 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact GX SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental ProContact GX SSR, 55 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology