Michelin Cross Terrain looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact TX vs Michelin Cross Terrain — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Cross Terrain is ahead, 72–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Cross Terrain
Tire BMichelin

Cross Terrain

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Cross Terrain +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6271

    ProContact TX: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Cross Terrain +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    ProContact TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    No road tests of wet for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    ProContact TX: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Cross Terrain +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5970

    ProContact TX: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact TX or Cross Terrain. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    ProContact TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of noise for ProContact TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Cross Terrain +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6678

    ProContact TX: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Terrain +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXCross Terrain
    Reviews found online5671
Scores at a glance
Continental ProContact TX vs Michelin Cross Terrain: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContact TXMichelin Cross Terrain
Relative Score 65 72
Dry 64 70
Wet 68 74
Snow 61 –
Comfort 64 70
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 66 73
Handling (owners) 56 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ProContact TX

Cross Terrain

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact TX

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Cross Terrain

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
  • Superior quietness and ride comfort
  • Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions

Cons

  • Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
  • Discontinued product availability
  • Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
All owner themes in the Cross Terrain review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact TX B · Michelin Cross Terrain
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available49—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact TX

Michelin Cross Terrain

Winner: Michelin Cross Terrain — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Cross Terrain rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 71 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 70 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ProContact TX
Tire B · Michelin Cross Terrain

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact TX or Cross Terrain?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact TX or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact TX or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact TX or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact TX or Cross Terrain?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology