Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Continental PureContact LS vs General Altimax Arctic — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 32 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 69–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 32 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PureContact LS +1257Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 57
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
PureContact LS +1062Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 59 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 72
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 62
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
PureContact LS +760Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 52 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
PureContact LS +653Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 54 46 PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59
Altimax Arctic: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 46.2 = 53
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +959Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 49 PureContact LS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 59
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +1157Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 69 50 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +2247Why this score
Source PureContact LS Altimax Arctic Reviews found online 69 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 58 |
| Dry | 69 | 57 |
| Wet | 72 | 62 |
| Snow | 67 | 60 |
| Comfort | 59 | 53 |
| Noise | 68 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PureContact LS
Altimax Arctic
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Altimax Arctic
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months
Cons
- Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
- Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
- Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
General Altimax Arctic
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 47 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 57 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 57 on treadwear.
Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 62 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 59 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Altimax Arctic?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology