tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS is ahead, 69–52

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    PureContact LS +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7045

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    PureContact LS +21
    51
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7344

    PureContact LS: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6444

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    PureContact LS +6
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5546

    PureContact LS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6945

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +24
    46
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSEnergy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online7046
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 69 52
Dry 69 53
Wet 72 51
Snow 67 54
Comfort 59 53
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 68 53
Handling (owners) 70 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

PureContact LS

± 8

Energy Saver A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 70 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 53 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental PureContact LS, 59 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology