Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 29 reviews
Continental PureContact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental PureContact vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 29 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact is ahead, 72–54
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
PureContact +1754Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 72 47 PureContact: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 54
No road tests of dry for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
76
Wet
PureContact +2551Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 78 44 PureContact: 60% × 74.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 51
No road tests of wet for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – PureContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
PureContact +1454Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 46 PureContact: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 68
NanoEnergy 2: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.4 = 54
No road tests of comfort for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 72 – PureContact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for PureContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact +1157Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 PureContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison47Why this score
Source PureContact NanoEnergy 2 Reviews found online – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact | Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 54 |
| Dry | 71 | 54 |
| Wet | 76 | 51 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 54 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
PureContact
54
/ 100
NanoEnergy 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Great overall performance relative to price
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced cornering confidence or understeer on certain light vehicles
- Some users perceive the sidewalls as thin and vulnerable to minor punctures
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle applications
Tire B NanoEnergy 2
Pros
- High level of ride comfort
- Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
- Low noise levels
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Tendency to squeal during cornering
- Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental PureContact
54
/ 100
Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Winner: Continental PureContact — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PureContact scores 76 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PureContact scores 71 vs 54 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental PureContact scores 68 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental PureContact scores 68 vs 57 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental PureContact
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact or NanoEnergy 2?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact or NanoEnergy 2?
Continental PureContact, 76 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact or NanoEnergy 2?
Continental PureContact, 71 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact or NanoEnergy 2?
Continental PureContact, 68 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, PureContact or NanoEnergy 2?
Continental PureContact, 68 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology