tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 14 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S is ahead, 69–53

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 7

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy 2

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +15
    54
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6747

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 67.2 = 69

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 54

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +22
    51
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7144

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71 = 73

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 51

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online77–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 70

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Kinergy 4S +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6646

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    NanoEnergy 2: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.4 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S +6
    57
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6351

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 62.9 = 63

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +17
    47
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Reviews found online6447
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SToyo NanoEnergy 2
Relative Score 69 53
Dry 69 54
Wet 73 51
Snow 70 –
Comfort 67 54
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 63 57
Handling (owners) 64 47
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Kinergy 4S

± 8

NanoEnergy 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy 4SNanoEnergy 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test #50/50 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B NanoEnergy 2

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort
  • Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
  • Low noise levels

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
  • Tendency to squeal during cornering
  • Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available67—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—
UTQG500 - 600 A A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Toyo NanoEnergy 2

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 64 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S or NanoEnergy 2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 63 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology