Head-to-head Updated

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 33 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat 62, Advan Sport AS 61.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 64 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +15
    51
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)42
    Reviews found online6464

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 64.4 = 51

    No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)57
    Reviews found online6468

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 67.6 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Advan Sport AS +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)62
    Reviews found online4868

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.9 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–73
    Reviews found online–67

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 70

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport AS +23
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 57 (est.)79
    Reviews found online3964

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Sport AS +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatAdvan Sport AS
    Reviews found online6166
Scores at a glance
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Sport Contact 5 SSR RunflatYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 62 61
Dry 66 51
Wet 65 61
Snow – 58
Comfort 58 65
Noise – 70
Treadwear 50 73
Handling (owners) 61 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Advan Sport AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
  • Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
  • Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
  • Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
  • Elevated road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat review

Tire B Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Too close to call: Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on dry and wet. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on treadwear and comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 66 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 65 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 65 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport AS?

Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport AS?

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat, 65 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport AS?

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat, 66 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 65 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology