Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 33 reviews
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V103 is ahead, 79–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Advan Sport V103 +1480Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 64 87 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 86.6 = 80
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Advan Sport V103 +1782Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 64 86 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.8 = 82
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
58
Comfort
Advan Sport V103 +1876Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 48 82 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Advan Sport V103 +2171Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 39 74 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport V103 +2485Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Advan Sport V103 Reviews found online 61 85
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 79 |
| Dry | 66 | 80 |
| Wet | 65 | 82 |
| Comfort | 58 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Advan Sport V103
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
- Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
- Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
- Elevated road noise as the tires age
Tire B Advan Sport V103
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and progressive handling at the limit
- Comfortable ride with low noise levels
- Sharper and more acute steering response
Cons
- Sudden drop-off in performance once the tread reaches its wear limit, particularly on the inside edges
- Limited specific feedback on extreme wet weather limits compared to dry performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 85 vs 61 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 76 vs 58 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 82 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 82 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 80 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 76 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 71 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology