Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 18 reviews
Continental Sport Contact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental Sport Contact vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 18 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk Indy 500 is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Firehawk Indy 500 +1074Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 62 77 Sport Contact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
66
Wet
Level66Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 65 Sport Contact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison45Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online – 27 Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 27.4 = 45
No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Firehawk Indy 500 +465Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 64 Sport Contact: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61
Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 64 Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Firehawk Indy 500 +866Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 53 61 Sport Contact: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Firehawk Indy 500 +1071Why this score
Source Sport Contact Firehawk Indy 500 Reviews found online 61 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 69 |
| Dry | 64 | 74 |
| Wet | 66 | 66 |
| Snow | – | 45 |
| Comfort | 61 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Contact
Firehawk Indy 500
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Commendable tread life and durability for a performance-oriented tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet weather performance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread wear reports ranging from 6,000 to 40,000 miles
- Increased road noise reported by some users
Tire B Firehawk Indy 500
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
- Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
- Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Sport Contact
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly praised as an exceptional value and 'bang for your buck' summer performance tire. Drivers consistently highlight strong dry grip, commendable wet traction, comfortable ride quality, and progressive handling breakaway. Minor criticisms center on reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer steering feedback, and grease on hard track sessions.
“I had them on my B8.5 S4. I found the sidewall stiffness to be very low and introduced more slop in the steering than the continentals I was running prior. Sent from my iPhone using Audizine Forum”
“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Based on 141 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact | B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 47 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Sport Contact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 64 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact or Firehawk Indy 500?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact or Firehawk Indy 500?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology