tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental TerrainContact A/T vs General Grabber HTS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 33 + 990 owner reviews. How we score

TerrainContact A/T is ahead, 74–58

Check price on Amazon · TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental TerrainContact A/T
Tire AContinental

TerrainContact A/T

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 33 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test (dry braking)

General Grabber HTS
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews

“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    TerrainContact A/T +19
    58
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7853

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 78.4 = 77

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    TerrainContact A/T +19
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8457

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    TerrainContact A/T +7
    58
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6149

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for TerrainContact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    TerrainContact A/T +17
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7248

    TerrainContact A/T: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 72.3 = 72

    Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 79

    Noise

    TerrainContact A/T +17
    62
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests82≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7455

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 74.4 = 79

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    TerrainContact A/T +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7046

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    TerrainContact A/T +20
    54
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber HTS
    Reviews found online7454
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TerrainContact A/TGeneral Grabber HTS
Relative Score 74 58
Dry 77 58
Wet 80 61
Snow 65 58
Comfort 72 55
Noise 79 62
Treadwear 68 54
Handling (owners) 74 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

TerrainContact A/T

± 7

Grabber HTS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TerrainContact A/T

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality for an all-terrain tire
  • Superior wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Strong on-road handling and stability during highway driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance on ice and packed snow
  • Limited capability in deep mud or extreme off-road terrain
  • Reports of premature tread wear in some heavy-duty or high-torque applications
All owner themes in the TerrainContact A/T review

Tire B Grabber HTS

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
  • Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
  • Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental TerrainContact A/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber HTS

Positive

Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.

r/F150Lightning ·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28

“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2011-05-14

“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”
r/tires ·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04

“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TerrainContact A/T B · General Grabber HTS
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available309
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 16/32″11 - 13/32″
UTQG680 A A - B640 A B
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 80 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TerrainContact A/T

General Grabber HTS

Winner: Continental TerrainContact A/T — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 74 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 77 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 80 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 72 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental TerrainContact A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Which is better in the wet, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 80 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 77 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 65 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 79 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 72 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 68 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology