Head-to-head Updated

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

TrueContact Tour is ahead, 77–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    TrueContact Tour +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8059

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 76

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 80

    Wet

    TrueContact Tour +12
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8467

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 80

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    TrueContact Tour +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7961

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 74

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    TrueContact Tour +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8165

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 75

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    TrueContact Tour +21
    57
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourDynapro HP
    Reviews found online7857
Scores at a glance
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Dynapro HP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental TrueContact TourHankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 77 64
Dry 76 62
Wet 80 68
Snow 70 –
Comfort 74 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 75 65
Handling (owners) 78 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

TrueContact Tour

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TrueContact Tour B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available114
Rim diameters16″16″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG700 - 800 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - White Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TrueContact Tour

Hankook Dynapro HP

Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental TrueContact Tour
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 80 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 74 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Dynapro HP?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology