Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 19 reviews
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 27 road tests and 19 + 3,669 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour is ahead, 78–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 27 tests Owners 60 · 3,669 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)
“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
TrueContact Tour +572Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 82 56 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 56 = 72
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
83
Wet
TrueContact Tour +578Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 80 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 88 65 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 80 (est.) + 40% × 87.5 = 83
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 64.9 = 78
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Kinergy 4S2 +271Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 68 61 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 60.8 = 71
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +1561Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 79 54 TrueContact Tour: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76
Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 71.5 + 60% × 54.4 = 61
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
73
Noise
TrueContact Tour +1063Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 82 ≈ 66 (est.) TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 73
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 63
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
79
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +1267Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 86 60 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.1 = 79
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
TrueContact Tour +2456Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Reviews found online 80 56 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison51Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Kinergy 4S2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests – 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 70 |
| Dry | 77 | 72 |
| Wet | 83 | 78 |
| Snow | 69 | 71 |
| Comfort | 76 | 61 |
| Noise | 73 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 56 |
| Efficiency | – | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
TrueContact Tour
Kinergy 4S2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B Kinergy 4S2
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
- High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives
Cons
- Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
- Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
- Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental TrueContact Tour
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a good-value 3PMSF all-weather tire, often recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 thanks to strong wet performance and good independent test results. Complaints include a stiff ride, highway road noise, fast or uneven tread wear, and weaker snow and ice grip for some owners. Several users noted that ice performance wasn't tested and that it suits milder, wet climates best.
“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”
“New Tyres - Kia dealership recommend Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 H750 215/55R17 98W Just had my 40,000 service at my local Kia dealership for my ‘22 E Niro. I am going to get my tyres changed elsewhere to save a few £££’s but am just wondering if the Hankooks are a good tyre? I am looking at around £140-160 per tyre and wondering if this is a good tyre for the price or if anyone has better suggestion for similar price or cheaper?”
“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 95 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 500 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Where the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 56 on handling.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 79 vs 67 on treadwear.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 73 vs 63 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 78 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 77 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 73 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Kinergy 4S2?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 79 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology