Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 19 reviews
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Kumho Solus KH16 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 34 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour is ahead, 78–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 34 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
TrueContact Tour +1859Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 82 54 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Solus KH16: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
83
Wet
TrueContact Tour +2063Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 80 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 87 60 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 79.8 (est.) + 40% × 87.4 = 83
Solus KH16: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
TrueContact Tour +1455Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 45 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Solus KH16: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +1462Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 59 TrueContact Tour: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76
Solus KH16: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Noise
TrueContact Tour +865Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 82 63 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 73
Solus KH16: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
79
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +2158Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 86 54 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 86.1 = 79
Solus KH16: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
TrueContact Tour +2258Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Solus KH16 Reviews found online 80 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 60 |
| Dry | 77 | 59 |
| Wet | 83 | 63 |
| Snow | 69 | 55 |
| Comfort | 76 | 62 |
| Noise | 73 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
TrueContact Tour
Solus KH16
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B Solus KH16
Pros
- Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
- Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives
Cons
- Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
- Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
- A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Kumho Solus KH16
Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 58 on handling.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 79 vs 58 on treadwear.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 63 on wet.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 77 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 77 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 69 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 73 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Solus KH16?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 79 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology