Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 34 reviews
Kumho Solus KH16 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Solus KH16 is ahead, 60–43
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 30 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Solus KH16 +1544Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 55 31 -
63
Wet
Solus KH16 +2340Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 61 29 -
55
Snow
Solus KH16 +847Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 45 31 -
66
Comfort
Solus KH16 +2145Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 62 20 -
66
Noise
Solus KH16 +1551Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 64 27 -
60
Treadwear
Solus KH16 +1248Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 57 35 -
59
Handling
Solus KH16 +3425Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 59 25
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH16 | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 43 |
| Dry | 59 | 44 |
| Wet | 63 | 40 |
| Snow | 55 | 47 |
| Comfort | 66 | 45 |
| Noise | 66 | 51 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 48 |
| Handling | 59 | 25 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus KH16
BluEarth S34
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KH16
Pros
- Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
- Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives
Cons
- Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
- Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
- A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
Tire B BluEarth S34
Pros
- Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
- Low rolling resistance design
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance and traction
- High levels of road noise
- Mediocre handling characteristics
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH16 | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 440 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KH16
Yokohama BluEarth S34
Winner: Kumho Solus KH16 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 59 vs 25 on handling.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 63 vs 40 on wet.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 66 vs 45 on comfort.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 59 vs 44 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.