Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 34 reviews
Kumho Solus KH16 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 34 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Solus KH16 is ahead, 59–41
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Solus KH16 +1742Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 54 28 Solus KH16: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59
BluEarth S34: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.4 = 42
No road tests of dry for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
Solus KH16 +2340Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 60 28 Solus KH16: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
BluEarth S34: 60% × 47.4 (est.) + 40% × 28 = 40
No road tests of wet for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Solus KH16 +847Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 45 30 Solus KH16: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 55
BluEarth S34: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 30.4 = 47
No road tests of snow for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Solus KH16 +2636Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 59 20 Solus KH16: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
BluEarth S34: 40% × 59.1 (est.) + 60% × 20.3 = 36
No road tests of comfort for Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Solus KH16: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65
No road tests of noise for Solus KH16. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Solus KH16 +1246Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 54 34 Solus KH16: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
BluEarth S34: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.5 = 46
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Solus KH16 +3424Why this score
Source Solus KH16 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 58 24
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH16 | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 41 |
| Dry | 59 | 42 |
| Wet | 63 | 40 |
| Snow | 55 | 47 |
| Comfort | 62 | 36 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 24 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Solus KH16
BluEarth S34
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KH16
Pros
- Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
- Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives
Cons
- Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
- Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
- A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
Tire B BluEarth S34
Pros
- Dry grip is described as adequate by most reviewers and as 'phenomenal' by one.
- Low rolling resistance contributes to fuel savings on hybrids.
- One reviewer found handling great and the tire very good value for the price.
Cons
- Wet traction is the most frequent complaint: reports of slipping in the rain, sliding when turning in wet conditions despite traction and stability control, and initial slipperiness on new tires.
- Handling is described as poor or only 'so-so' by several reviewers.
- Noise is prominent, including wind and road noise at speed (one reviewer measured roughly 85 dB at 70 mph).
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH16 | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 440 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KH16
Yokohama BluEarth S34
Winner: Kumho Solus KH16 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama BluEarth S34 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 58 vs 24 on handling.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 62 vs 36 on comfort.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 63 vs 40 on wet.
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 59 vs 42 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Which is better in the wet, Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Kumho Solus KH16, 63 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Kumho Solus KH16, 59 vs 42 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Kumho Solus KH16, 55 vs 47 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Kumho Solus KH16, 62 vs 36 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Solus KH16 or BluEarth S34?
Kumho Solus KH16, 58 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology