tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

TrueContact Tour is ahead, 78–52

Check price on Amazon · TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    TrueContact Tour +25
    52
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online8244

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 83

    Wet

    TrueContact Tour +32
    51
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 80 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online8743

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 79.8 (est.) + 40% × 87.4 = 83

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 51

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    TrueContact Tour +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6844

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 55

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    TrueContact Tour +24
    52
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7945

    TrueContact Tour: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76

    Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.5 = 73

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    TrueContact Tour +26
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8645

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 79

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    TrueContact Tour +35
    45
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourEnergy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online8045
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TrueContact TourMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 78 52
Dry 77 52
Wet 83 51
Snow 69 55
Comfort 76 52
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 79 53
Handling (owners) 80 45

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

TrueContact Tour

± 8

Energy Saver A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TrueContact Tour B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG700 - 800 A A - B480 A - B A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - White Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TrueContact Tour

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 79 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 77 vs 52 on dry.

Tire A · Continental TrueContact Tour
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 77 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 69 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Energy Saver A/S?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 79 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology