Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 19 reviews
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 19 + 34 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour is ahead, 78–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 34 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
TrueContact Tour +375Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 83 78 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 78
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 75
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
83
Wet
TrueContact Tour +974Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 80 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 88 75 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 80.2 (est.) + 40% × 87.8 = 83
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
TrueContact Tour +565Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 61 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
76
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +472Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 80 74 TrueContact Tour: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 73.9 = 72
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Noise
TrueContact Tour +568Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 83 76 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 73
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 76.4 = 68
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
78
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +771Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 86 75 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 86 = 78
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
81
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour AVID Ascend LX Reviews found online 81 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 72 |
| Dry | 78 | 75 |
| Wet | 83 | 74 |
| Snow | 70 | 65 |
| Comfort | 76 | 72 |
| Noise | 73 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
TrueContact Tour
AVID Ascend LX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B AVID Ascend LX
Pros
- Exceptional treadlife with reports of high mileage remaining even after tens of thousands of miles
- Smooth and exceptionally comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise at highway speeds
Cons
- A few users experienced poor wet weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning
- Isolated reports of rapid, uneven front tire wear
- Slightly higher road noise noted by a minority of drivers compared to previous sets
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 85,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 74 on wet.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 71 on treadwear.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 70 vs 65 on snow.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 73 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 78 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 73 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 78 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology