tirewheelguide

Yokohama S306 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Yokohama S306 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

TrueContact Tour is ahead, 79–58

Check price on Amazon · TrueContact Tour or S306 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama S306
Tire BYokohama

S306

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    TrueContact Tour +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8257

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 77

    S306: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 83

    Wet

    TrueContact Tour +27
    56
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 80 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8851

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 79.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.5 = 83

    S306: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

    No road tests of wet for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 69

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    TrueContact Tour +21
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8048

    TrueContact Tour: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.5 = 76

    S306: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or S306. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online82–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 73

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 79

    Treadwear

    TrueContact Tour +18
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8657

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.3 = 79

    S306: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    TrueContact Tour +31
    49
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourS306
    Reviews found online8049
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TrueContact TourYokohama S306
Relative Score 79 58
Dry 77 61
Wet 83 56
Snow 69 –
Comfort 76 55
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 79 61
Handling (owners) 80 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

TrueContact Tour

± 8

S306

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Tire B S306

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback

Cons

  • Consistently poor wet weather traction
  • Harsh ride quality and high road noise
  • Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the S306 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TrueContact Tour B · Yokohama S306
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG700 - 800 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - White Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TrueContact Tour

Yokohama S306

Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama S306 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 79 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental TrueContact Tour
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama S306
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TrueContact Tour or S306?

Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or S306?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or S306?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 77 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or S306?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or S306?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 79 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology