tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental VikingContact 6 vs Firestone Winterforce 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: VikingContact 6 62, Winterforce 2 61.

Check price on Amazon · VikingContact 6 Check price on Amazon · Winterforce 2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Winterforce 2
Tire BFirestone

Winterforce 2

Winter Premium Touring tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    VikingContact 6 +8
    50
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online5341

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 50

    No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6363

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    Winterforce 2 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5777

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 74

    No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    VikingContact 6 +9
    51
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5643

    VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.5 = 60

    Winterforce 2: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 42.9 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–46

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    VikingContact 6 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6454

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    VikingContact 6 +7
    49
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6Winterforce 2
    Reviews found online5649
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental VikingContact 6Firestone Winterforce 2
Relative Score 62 61
Dry 58 50
Wet 65 65
Snow 63 74
Comfort 60 51
Noise – 58
Treadwear 65 59
Handling (owners) 56 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

VikingContact 6

± 8

Winterforce 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A VikingContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
  • Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
  • Acceptable road noise levels

Cons

  • Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
  • Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
  • Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
All owner themes in the VikingContact 6 review

Tire B Winterforce 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
  • Highly competitive price point
  • Reliable performance for daily winter commuting

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
  • Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
  • Limited performance on ice without studs
All owner themes in the Winterforce 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental VikingContact 6 B · Firestone Winterforce 2
CategoryWinterWinter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1031
Rim diameters14″ – 21″14″ – 18″
Tread depth—12/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental VikingContact 6

Firestone Winterforce 2

Too close to call: Continental VikingContact 6 and Firestone Winterforce 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental VikingContact 6 is stronger on comfort, dry and handling. Firestone Winterforce 2 is stronger on snow. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Winterforce 2 scores 74 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental VikingContact 6 scores 60 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental VikingContact 6 scores 58 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental VikingContact 6 scores 56 vs 49 on handling.

Tire A · Continental VikingContact 6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Which is better in the wet, VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Continental VikingContact 6, 58 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Firestone Winterforce 2, 74 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Continental VikingContact 6, 60 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, VikingContact 6 or Winterforce 2?

Continental VikingContact 6, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology