Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental VikingContact 6 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 7 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +2179Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 53 87 VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79
No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +1378Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 63 88 VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +1578Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 57 82 VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.7 = 78
No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +1070Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 56 81 VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.5 = 60
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 81 = 70
No road tests of comfort for VikingContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 82 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +1378Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 64 85 VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Agilis CrossClimate +2581Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 56 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source VikingContact 6 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 6 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 78 |
| Dry | 58 | 79 |
| Wet | 65 | 78 |
| Snow | 63 | 78 |
| Comfort | 60 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
VikingContact 6
78
/ 100
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A VikingContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
- Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
- Acceptable road noise levels
Cons
- Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
- Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
- Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental VikingContact 6
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
airforums.com
·2021-06-27
“I have the Cross Climates on my 3500 and although they have less than 10,000 miles on them they are great so far. One thing about Discount Tire, I love them for all my other cars but I'm a bit leery of taking a Sprinter to them. There are several cases of damage due to lifting Sprinters at the wrong points but perhaps the bigger issue is that they do not have (at least none of the stores in Tucson) the proper Mercedes centering tool that fits the Sprinter wheels and makes sure they are absolutely centered on the balancing machine. A local big truck and motorhome shop here has it and that's where I go for tire service on the Sprinter. See post #9 here:”
f150forum.com
“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”
sportsmobileforum.com
·2023-09-14
“We are the same as you - 98% paved road. I just put a set of Michelin Agilis CrossClimates on my '01 E250 (LT225). Perfect ride - stable and quiet. But I only have one trip on them. I did notice that even after only 4000 miles I can easily measure some tread wear. Maybe this is normal, but I'm not sure how long they will last. But so far the road performance is very good.”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 6 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 10 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 21″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Continental VikingContact 6
78
/ 100
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 56 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 58 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 63 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 65 on wet.
Tire A · Continental VikingContact 6
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, VikingContact 6 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology