Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 60 · 32 reviews
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Evolution Tour leads, 68–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 674 reviews
“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Evolution Tour +368Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 49 69 -
66
Wet
Evolution Tour +571Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) 69 – Reviews found online 62 71 -
75
Snow
VikingContact 7 +1659Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) 79 – Reviews found online 70 52 -
70
Comfort
VikingContact 7 +169Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 71 69 -
79
Noise
VikingContact 7 +1168Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) 86 – Reviews found online 67 70 -
59
Treadwear
Evolution Tour +968Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Reviews found online 54 70 -
60
Handling
Evolution Tour +969Why this score
Source VikingContact 7 Evolution Tour Reviews found online 60 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 68 |
| Dry | 65 | 68 |
| Wet | 66 | 71 |
| Snow | 75 | 59 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 79 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 68 |
| Handling | 60 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
VikingContact 7
Evolution Tour
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A VikingContact 7
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in slush and deep snow
- Stable and predictable handling at highway speeds
Cons
- Mixed reports regarding tread life and longevity
- Noticeable decline in ice-braking performance compared to top-tier ice specialists
- Compound may harden or performance may degrade after multiple seasons
Tire B Evolution Tour
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
Cons
- Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
- Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
- Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental VikingContact 7
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Evolution Tour
Community members praise the Cooper Evolution Tour for its quiet, comfortable ride and solid baseline performance compared to OEM alternatives. However, users consistently express disappointment regarding rapid tread wear, noting the tire wears down much faster than its 65,000-mile rating suggests.
“No one recommending Cooper tires? Hey everyone!! My very first car is a 2019 honda fit EX and I'm new to pretty much everything in regards to it. I've had it since May of last year. I don't see any recommendations for Cooper tires. Is there a reason for this? I'm looking into the Cooper Evolution Tour All Season. My dad (who used to be a mechanic) suggests them, and they're available at the closest Walmart. I'm also looking into Yokohama, but they'll have to be shipped and they're 20$ more per tire. I'll most likely replace all four. I'm at 32k miles, but my rear passenger tire blew out the other day. The car still has the stock tires. Read more”
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 134 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 580 - 600 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental VikingContact 7
Cooper Evolution Tour
Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if snow and noise matter most to you.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 75 vs 59 on snow.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 79 vs 68 on noise.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 59 on treadwear.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 60 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.