Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 60 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 8 + 0 road tests and 32 + 32 owner reviews. How we score
VikingContact 7 is ahead, 68–59
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 60 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 32 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 49 | 51 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 49.4 = 66
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 57
No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 68 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 60 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 68.4 + 40% × 62.1 = 66
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 62
No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 52 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 70.1 = 75
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 59
No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 51 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 70 + 40% × 71 = 70
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 54 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 68.1 = 80
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
No road tests of noise for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 50 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 60 | 49 |
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 59 |
| Dry | 66 | 57 |
| Wet | 66 | 62 |
| Snow | 75 | 59 |
| Comfort | 70 | 60 |
| Noise | 80 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
VikingContact 7
Altimax Arctic
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 134 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Continental VikingContact 7
General Altimax Arctic
Winner: Continental VikingContact 7 — better noise, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 80 vs 62 on noise.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 75 vs 59 on snow.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 60 vs 49 on handling.
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental VikingContact 7, 66 vs 62 on our wet score.
Continental VikingContact 7, 66 vs 57 on our dry score.
Continental VikingContact 7, 75 vs 59 on our snow score.
Continental VikingContact 7, 80 vs 62 on our noise score.
Continental VikingContact 7, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology