Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 63 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 1 road tests and 32 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 63 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 53 | 83 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 52.7 = 67
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 68 | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 84 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 68.4 + 40% × 66.5 = 68
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 76 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 72.4 = 76
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 78 |
VikingContact 7: 40% × 70 + 60% × 71.3 = 71
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 89 | – |
| Reviews found online | 69 | – |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 68.8 = 81
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 63 (est.) | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 85 |
VikingContact 7: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 64 | 80 |
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 77 | – |
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 78 |
| Dry | 67 | 78 |
| Wet | 68 | 81 |
| Snow | 76 | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 75 |
| Noise | 81 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 80 |
| Efficiency | 77 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
VikingContact 7
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | VikingContact 7 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/15 2025 Teknikens Värld Winter Tire Test R17 | #3/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 134 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Continental VikingContact 7
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, handling and wet. Where the Continental VikingContact 7 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 60 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 68 on our wet score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 67 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology