Head-to-head Updated

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV vs BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 18 road tests and 5 + 30 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Winter 2 is ahead, 81–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 73 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test (wet braking)

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
± 5

Tests 79 · 18 tests Owners 84 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 11 tests6863
    Reviews found online7281

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 60% × 68.1 + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 80.8 = 70

  2. 75

    Wet

    g-Force Winter 2 +12
    87
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests7786
    Reviews found online7289

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 71.9 = 75

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

  3. 68

    Snow

    g-Force Winter 2 +21
    89
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests7694
    Reviews found online5682

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 56.1 = 68

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 82.4 = 89

  4. 72

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +8
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7386

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 73 = 72

    g-Force Winter 2: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 85.7 = 80

    No road tests of comfort for Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    g-Force Winter 2 +14
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 11 tests6183
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 60% × 61.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 63

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 68 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7282

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 70

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 81.6 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +14
    85
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Reviews found online7185
  8. 81

    Efficiency

    Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV +20
    61
    Why this score
    SourceWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 11 tests8161
Scores at a glance
Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV vs BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUVBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Relative Score 70 81
Dry 70 70
Wet 75 87
Snow 68 89
Comfort 72 80
Noise 63 77
Treadwear 70 76
Handling (owners) 71 85
Efficiency 81 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

± 5

g-Force Winter 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV finished ahead 0 times and BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinter Contact TS 850 P SUVg-Force Winter 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/16 #2/16 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/65 R16 · 215/65 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

Pros

  • Balanced performance across dry and wet conditions
  • Secure handling and positive steering feedback on snow and ice
  • Good overall traction in cold weather environments

Cons

  • Subpar aquaplaning resistance reported by some users
  • Inconsistent grip leading to rear-wheel spin in non-dry conditions
  • Mixed snow and winter slush performance depending on severity
All owner themes in the Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV review

Tire B g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—75
Rim diameters—14″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better snow, noise and handling. Pick the Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV scores 81 vs 61 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 77 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Which is better in the wet, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 87 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 89 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 77 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 80 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 76 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV, 81 vs 61 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology