Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV vs BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 21 road tests and 15 + 30 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Alpin 5 SUV 79, g-Force Winter 2 80.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
± 5

Tests 83 · 6 tests Owners 78 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
± 5

Tests 78 · 21 tests Owners 83 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 12 tests7662
    Reviews found online8080

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 76.2 + 40% × 79.9 = 78

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 80.2 = 69

  2. 82

    Wet

    g-Force Winter 2 +5
    87
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 21 tests8286
    Reviews found online8289

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 81.8 = 82

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 86 + 40% × 88.5 = 87

  3. 83

    Snow

    g-Force Winter 2 +6
    89
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 21 tests8994
    Reviews found online7582

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 74.6 = 83

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 82 = 89

  4. 74

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7685

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.4 = 74

    g-Force Winter 2: 40% × 66.9 + 60% × 85 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 84

    Noise

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 12 tests9581
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 84

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 70 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7582

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 72

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 81.7 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +6
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Reviews found online7985
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    g-Force Winter 2 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 12 tests6365
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV vs BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUVBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Relative Score 79 80
Dry 78 69
Wet 82 87
Snow 83 89
Comfort 74 78
Noise 84 75
Treadwear 72 76
Handling (owners) 79 85
Efficiency 63 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

± 5

g-Force Winter 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Alpin 5 SUVg-Force Winter 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #2/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 94% #12/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #5/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test 97% #19/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 92% #7/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 99% #2/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 87% #7/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 98% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #4/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 86% #11/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 96% #7/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test 95% #17/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 95% #13/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 93% #6/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 99% #3/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 99% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Slalom Snow 98% #2/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test 99% #9/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 92% #7/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 100% #2/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test 98% #10/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% #3/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 97% #5/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 45% #7/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test 64% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #1/10 2025 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R18 #11/20 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling on wet and slushy roads
  • High tread life and durability over long distances
  • Excellent dry road comfort and low noise levels

Cons

  • Abrupt loss of grip when reaching the limit on hard-packed snow
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
  • Performance can feel less predictable than dedicated Nordic winter tires in extreme ice/snow conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Alpin 5 SUV review

Tire B g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7175
Rim diameters17″ – 23″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV and BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV is stronger on dry and noise. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on snow, handling and wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 78 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 84 vs 75 on noise.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 83 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 79 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 87 vs 82 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 78 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 89 vs 83 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 84 vs 75 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 76 vs 72 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or g-Force Winter 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology