Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 78 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 11 road tests and 14 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
UltraGrip Performance+ is ahead, 79–74
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 78 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 81 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 73 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 76 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 98% |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73 + 40% × 76.4 = 74
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 76.1 = 73
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests | 70 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 85 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 90% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 91% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 100% |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 80.1 = 74
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 85.1 = 86
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests | 71 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 80 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 96% | 100% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 99% |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 76.9 = 73
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 79.8 = 84
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 81 |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 76
UltraGrip Performance+: 40% × 72.3 + 60% × 81.1 = 78
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 74 | 55 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 98% | 95% |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 55.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 860 S or UltraGrip Performance+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 81 |
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 74
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 80.8 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 81 | 83 |
| Source | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 77 | 76 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 93% |
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 860 S | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 79 |
| Dry | 74 | 73 |
| Wet | 74 | 86 |
| Snow | 73 | 84 |
| Comfort | 76 | 78 |
| Noise | 71 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 83 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
WinterContact TS 860 S
UltraGrip Performance+
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental WinterContact TS 860 S finished ahead 0 times and Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 860 S | UltraGrip Performance+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% | 100% | −2.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 98% | +1.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% | 100% | −10.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% | 100% | −8.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 100% | −2.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% | 100% | −4.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% | 99% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 95% | +2.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 93% | +6.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 55% | 59% | −3.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/11 | #1/11 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test · 255/35 R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 92 | 88 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ — better wet, snow and treadwear. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S if noise matters most to you. Continental WinterContact TS 860 S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 86 vs 74 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 71 vs 60 on noise.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 84 vs 73 on snow.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 77 vs 74 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 86 vs 74 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 84 vs 73 on our snow score.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 71 vs 60 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 77 vs 74 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology