Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 78 · 31 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
WinterContact TS 870 P is ahead, 80–75
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,495 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (fuel consumption)
“Az enyémen Ventus Prime4 van, 23 májusi dottal, 23 május végén véve. Két nyár és 20.000km alatt sosem tapasztaltam hogy picit is gond lenne vele, pedig voltam bőven esőben vele. Az esp nekem akkor villogott nagyon mikor eltört a rugó, de az is inkább kanyarban, nem kigyorsításnál. Lengéscsillapítók rendben vannak?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Level80Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 82 83 Reviews found online 77 76 Dry Braking (% of best) 100% 99% Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 98% -
88
Wet
WinterContact TS 870 P +1078Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 91 80 Reviews found online 84 76 Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 87% Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 98% 99% Wet Circle (% of best) 87% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
77
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 76 – -
82
Comfort
WinterContact TS 870 P +1270Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 84 70 Reviews found online 80 71 -
74
Noise
WinterContact TS 870 P +1163Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 61 -
72
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +173Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 76 Reviews found online 75 69 -
80
Handling
WinterContact TS 870 P +674Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 80 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 75 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 88 | 78 |
| Snow | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 82 | 70 |
| Noise | 74 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 73 |
| Handling | 80 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
WinterContact TS 870 P
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 870 P | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 98% #2/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 77% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +20.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | +1.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/12 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 97% #2/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 96% #14/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −4.2 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 86% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 51% #8/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +34.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #10/12 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | −0.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 73% #7/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 62% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +11.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 47% #20/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 49% #22/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −2.3 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 66% #15/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | 72% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −6.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/11 · 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test | 9% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +24.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 92% #8/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 90% #10/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +2.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 80% #1/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | −15.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | +5.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 85% #6/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | +15.5 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #6/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | 87% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +6.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 98% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −0.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 87% #8/30 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −10.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #4/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | −0.9 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 870 P
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Outstanding wet weather and slush performance, cutting through heavy rain effortlessly
- Balanced dry and cold-weather handling with impressive cornering stability
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Steering response and initial stiffness are slightly softer and less sporty than dedicated summer tires or some rivals
- Snow and ice traction can feel less exceptional or borderline inadequate for a small subset of users
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 121 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better comfort, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 82 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 74 vs 63 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 80 vs 74 on handling.
Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.