Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 81 · 31 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 27 + 16 road tests and 31 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 870 P leads, 81–78 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 81 · 31 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 12 tests | 82 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 82 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 7–1 | 97% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 5–3 | 99% | 99% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 79 = 81
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.2 = 78
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 16 tests | 93 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 86 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 87% | 100% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 3–6 | 96% | 97% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 5–5 | 95% | 94% |
| Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 96% | 97% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–2 | 96% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 4–4 | 98% | 98% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 86.2 = 90
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 16 tests | 79 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 80 |
| Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 84% | 87% |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 5–6 | 96% | 96% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 5–3 | 98% | 97% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 93% | 90% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 4–4 | 96% | 95% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 76.2 = 78
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.1 = 80
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests | 84 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 74 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 91% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 40% × 83.9 + 60% × 81.1 = 82
Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 12 tests | 78 | 10 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 9–0 | 99% | 96% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 74
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 870 P or Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 4 tests | 71 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 81 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 83% | 89% |
| Wear (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 78% | 88% |
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 79.9 = 74
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 83 | 81 |
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 12 tests | 86 | 67 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 98% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 8–0 | 98% | 89% |
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 78 |
| Dry | 81 | 78 |
| Wet | 90 | 90 |
| Snow | 78 | 80 |
| Comfort | 82 | 72 |
| Noise | 74 | 33 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 86 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter i cept evo3
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 12 tests that ran both, Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 9 times and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 3 times.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 96% | +1.0 | 7–1 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | +0.5 | 5–3 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 87% | 100% | −13.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 97% | −1.6 | 3–6 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 94% | +0.1 | 5–5 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 96% | 97% | −1.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% | 97% | −1.0 | 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 98% | +0.1 | 4–4 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 84% | 87% | −3.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% | 96% | +0.3 | 5–6 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% | 97% | +0.7 | 5–3 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 93% | 90% | +2.9 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 96% | 95% | +0.7 | 4–4 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% | 91% | +8.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 96% | +3.0 | 9–0 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 83% | 89% | −6.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 78% | 88% | −9.8 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 100% | 98% | +1.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% | 89% | +9.1 | 8–0 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 53% | 67% | −14.0 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #11/20 | #9/20 | – | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 56% | 74% | −17.5 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/31 | #4/31 | – | 9–3 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 121 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 40 | 40 |
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Narrow edge: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better noise, efficiency and comfort. Pick the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 if treadwear matters most to you.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 74 vs 33 on noise.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 86 vs 67 on efficiency.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 82 vs 72 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 78 vs 74 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 90 vs 90 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 81 vs 78 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 80 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 74 vs 33 on our noise score.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 82 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 74 on our treadwear score.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 86 vs 67 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology