Cooper Discoverer A/TR looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Discoverer A/TR vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Discoverer A/TR
Tire ACooper

Discoverer A/TR

All-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6677

    Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6275

    Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TRDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
Cooper Discoverer A/TR vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Discoverer A/TRHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 66 73
Dry 67 73
Wet 68 74
Snow – 65
Comfort 67 72
Noise – 70
Treadwear 64 71
Handling (owners) 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Discoverer A/TR

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Discoverer A/TR

Pros

  • Remarkably low road noise for an all-terrain tire with a deep, chunky tread.
  • Excellent wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning.
  • Long-lasting tread life with high mileage capabilities (some users exceeding 50,000 to 80,000+ kms).

Cons

  • Some instances of severe edge chipping and cuts to the steel when used on rough outback gravel roads.
  • Tramlining effects in the steering as the tires wear down.
  • Off-road capability diminishes noticeably as the tread wears past a certain point.
All owner themes in the Discoverer A/TR review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Discoverer A/TR B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—29
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Discoverer A/TR

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Discoverer A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Cooper Discoverer A/TR
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Discoverer A/TR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology