Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Discoverer SRX vs General Grabber HTS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 340 + 990 owner reviews. How we score

Discoverer SRX is ahead, 76–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Discoverer SRX
Tire ACooper

Discoverer SRX

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 340 reviews

“I’ve had Cooper Discoverer SRX (all-season) with good experience.”

General Grabber HTS
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews

“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    Discoverer SRX +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8453

    Discoverer SRX: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 79

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Discoverer SRX +20
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 79 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8558

    Discoverer SRX: 60% × 78.7 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 81

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Discoverer SRX +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6850

    Discoverer SRX: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 69

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Discoverer SRX +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7749

    Discoverer SRX: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77 = 74

    Grabber HTS: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Discoverer SRX +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7456

    Discoverer SRX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 70

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Discoverer SRX +16
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7346

    Discoverer SRX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 70

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Discoverer SRX +23
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer SRXGrabber HTS
    Reviews found online7754
Scores at a glance
Cooper Discoverer SRX vs General Grabber HTS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Discoverer SRXGeneral Grabber HTS
Relative Score 76 58
Dry 79 58
Wet 81 61
Snow 69 58
Comfort 74 55
Noise 70 62
Treadwear 70 54
Handling (owners) 77 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Discoverer SRX

± 7

Grabber HTS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Discoverer SRX

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and winter weather traction (rain, slush, and snow)
  • Smooth and comfortable highway ride quality
  • Low road noise levels compared to stock or competing tires

Cons

  • Some users reported higher-than-average road noise or humming
  • Occasional tendency to wander or track on grooved pavement
  • A few reports of shorter tread life than advertised by isolated users
All owner themes in the Discoverer SRX review

Tire B Grabber HTS

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
  • Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
  • Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Discoverer SRX

Positive

Community sentiment for the Cooper Discoverer SRX is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers consistently highlighting its quiet ride, comfortable handling, and dependable all-season traction. Many users report unexpectedly competent performance in light snow and winter conditions, along with favorable pricing compared to competitors like Michelin. Tread life feedback is generally solid, though at least one owner noted shorter longevity than expected.

Top themes
#quiet and comfortable ride#winter and snow traction#treadwear and longevity#value and pricing#all-season performance#comparison to Michelin Defender

Based on 28 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber HTS

Positive

Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.

r/tires ·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04

“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2011-05-14

“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”

r/F150Lightning ·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28

“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”

Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Discoverer SRX B · General Grabber HTS
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available39
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 13/32″11 - 13/32″
UTQG600 - 740 A A - B640 A B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 50 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Discoverer SRX

General Grabber HTS

Winner: Cooper Discoverer SRX — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 77 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 79 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 81 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 74 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Cooper Discoverer SRX
Tire B · General Grabber HTS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Which is better in the wet, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 81 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 79 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 69 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 70 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 74 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Discoverer SRX or Grabber HTS?

Cooper Discoverer SRX, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology