Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Discoverer STT PRO vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 422 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro M/T leads, 66–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire BHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Dynapro M/T +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6364

    Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Dynapro M/T +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4853

    Discoverer STT PRO: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 54

    Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 53

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online32–

    Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 53

    No road tests of noise for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Dynapro M/T +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6066

    Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro M/T +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer STT PRODynapro M/T
    Reviews found online5261
Scores at a glance
Cooper Discoverer STT PRO vs Hankook Dynapro M/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Discoverer STT PROHankook Dynapro M/T
Relative Score 64 66
Dry 64 66
Wet 68 68
Snow 67 69
Comfort 54 58
Noise 53 –
Treadwear 62 66
Handling (owners) 52 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Discoverer STT PRO

± 8

Dynapro M/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Discoverer STT PRO

Pros

  • Outstanding off-road traction in mud, rocks, and dirt
  • Surprisingly low road noise and smooth ride for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design with tough sidewalls

Cons

  • Can be difficult to balance properly, leading to vibrations for some users
  • Faster tread wear reported by a subset of drivers under heavy use
  • Reduced traction in specific conditions like deep sand or packed snow/ice
All owner themes in the Discoverer STT PRO review

Tire B Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Discoverer STT PRO

Positive

Community members widely praise the Cooper Discoverer STT PRO for its exceptional off-road traction, towing capability, and dependable handling in mud, rain, and snow. While users note it balances well and rides comfortably for a mud-terrain tire, the most common criticisms involve pavement road noise that increases with wear and concerns regarding tread life on heavy trucks.

Top themes
#off-road traction#highway road noise#mud and snow performance#tread wear life#heavy truck towing#balancing and ride quality

Based on 38 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro M/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Discoverer STT PRO B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
CategoryMud-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available23—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth18 - 22/32″—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Discoverer STT PRO

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 61 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 58 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Cooper Discoverer STT PRO
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Which is better in the wet, Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 58 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Discoverer STT PRO or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology