Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 7 reviews
Cooper Zeon 4XS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Cooper Zeon 4XS vs General Grabber HTS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Zeon 4XS is ahead, 77–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Zeon 4XS +1758Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 79 53 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 75
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
No road tests of dry for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
81
Wet
Zeon 4XS +2061Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 84 57 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 78.1 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of wet for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison58Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 49 Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
Zeon 4XS +2155Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 80 48 Zeon 4XS: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 55 Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62
No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
Zeon 4XS +2054Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 78 46 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 74
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Zeon 4XS +2454Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Grabber HTS Reviews found online 78 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon 4XS | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 58 |
| Dry | 75 | 58 |
| Wet | 81 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 76 | 55 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Zeon 4XS
58
/ 100
Grabber HTS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Zeon 4XS
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- High level of cabin comfort with minimal road noise
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin and Pirelli
Cons
- Limited brand recognition compared to major market leaders
- Potential for reduced dry grip due to wide groove patterns
- Uncertainty regarding long-term tread life for some users
Tire B Grabber HTS
Pros
- Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
- Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
- Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
- Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Cooper Zeon 4XS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber HTS
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
r/F150Lightning
·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28
“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2011-05-14
“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”
r/tires
·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04
“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability
Based on 50 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon 4XS | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 9 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Cooper Zeon 4XS
58
/ 100
General Grabber HTS
Winner: Cooper Zeon 4XS — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Zeon 4XS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 78 vs 54 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 76 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 81 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 74 vs 54 on treadwear.
Tire A · Cooper Zeon 4XS
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Zeon 4XS or Grabber HTS?
Which is better in the wet, Zeon 4XS or Grabber HTS?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 81 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon 4XS or Grabber HTS?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 75 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Zeon 4XS or Grabber HTS?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 76 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Zeon 4XS or Grabber HTS?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 74 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology