Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 7 reviews
Cooper Zeon 4XS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Cooper Zeon 4XS vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 20 road tests and 7 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
Zeon 4XS is ahead, 77–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Zeon 4XS +372Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 79 59 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 75
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 58.6 = 72
No road tests of dry for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
81
Wet
Zeon 4XS +576Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 84 64 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 78.1 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 64.2 = 76
No road tests of wet for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
76
Comfort
Zeon 4XS +1165Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 80 50 Zeon 4XS: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
N Fera Sport SU2: 40% × 86.9 + 60% × 50 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison83Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 93 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 83
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Sport SU2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Zeon 4XS +2054Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 78 41 Zeon 4XS: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 74
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 41 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Zeon 4XS +1761Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews found online 78 61 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison47Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon 4XS | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 68 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 81 | 76 |
| Comfort | 76 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 83 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 61 |
| Efficiency | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Zeon 4XS
N Fera Sport SU2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Zeon 4XS
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- High level of cabin comfort with minimal road noise
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin and Pirelli
Cons
- Limited brand recognition compared to major market leaders
- Potential for reduced dry grip due to wide groove patterns
- Uncertainty regarding long-term tread life for some users
Tire B N Fera Sport SU2
Pros
- Significantly cheaper than premium tier alternatives like Michelin and Continental
- Impressive dry grip and predictable, controllable handling
- Strong wet weather performance and high-speed stability
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often requiring replacement prematurely
- Stiff carcass leading to mediocre ride comfort and harshness over road imperfections
- Soft rubber compound prone to squirming under hard cornering or experiencing shoulder damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon 4XS | B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Cooper Zeon 4XS
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Winner: Cooper Zeon 4XS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Zeon 4XS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 74 vs 54 on treadwear.
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 78 vs 61 on handling.
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.
Cooper Zeon 4XS scores 81 vs 76 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Zeon 4XS or N Fera Sport SU2?
Which is better in the wet, Zeon 4XS or N Fera Sport SU2?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 81 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon 4XS or N Fera Sport SU2?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Zeon 4XS or N Fera Sport SU2?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 76 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Zeon 4XS or N Fera Sport SU2?
Cooper Zeon 4XS, 74 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology